Location:  Home» VHS » Drama » Hamlet  
Sponsor
Categories
Books
DVD
Electronics
Jewellery & Watches
Music
Software
Tool
VHS
PC & Video Games
Related Categories
• Drama
Categories
DVD & VHS
Video
• VHS
Format (binding_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• PG
BBFC Rating (intended_use_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• Standard Edition
Editions (feature_two_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• 1990 - 1999
Release Date (feature_three_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• English
Language (theme_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• General
Drama
Categories
Video
• Condition (condition-type)
Refinements
Video
Subcategories
Drama
Comedy
Period
Condition (condition-type)
New
Used

Hamlet

Hamlet

enlarge enlarge 
Director: Franco Zeffirelli
Actors: Mel Gibson, Glenn Close, Alan Bates, Paul Scofield, Ian Holm
Studio: Columbia Tristar
Category: Video

List Price: £5.99
Buy New: £2.50
You Save: £3.49 (58%)



New (4) Used (10) from £1.86

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars 7 reviews
Sales Rank: 7381

Language: English (Original Language)
Rating: Parental Guidance
Media: VHS Tape
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 130 Minutes

EAN: 5014756276225
ASIN: B00004RNQ1

Theatrical Release Date: January 8, 1992
Release Date: April 17, 2000
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days

Editorial Reviews:

Amazon.co.uk Review
Franco Zeffirelli's stripped-down, two-hour version of Shakespeare's play stars Mel Gibson as a rather robust version of the ambivalent Danish prince. Gibson is much better in the part than many critics have admitted, his powers of clarity doing much to make this particular Hamlet more accessible than several other filmed versions. The supporting cast is outstanding, including Glenn Close as Gertrude, Alan Bates as Claudius, Ian Holm as Polonius, and Helena Bonham Carter as Ophelia. Zeffirelli's vigorous direction employs a lively camera style that nicely alters the viewer's preconceptions about the way Hamlet should look. --Tom Keogh


Customer Reviews:   Read 2 more reviews...

5 out of 5 stars Gloomy means lightless   June 11, 2006
Jacques COULARDEAU (OLLIERGUES France)
This Play is one of the most important pieces of drama and poetry in Shakespeare's complete works. A cycle of peace and quiet is disturbed by an incestuous crime, both the murder of a brother and the hasty and sensuous marriage of the murderer with the victim's wife, a marriage which is totally against the normal Christian and feudal rules of the time : you are not supposed to covet the wife of your brother. Then havoc falls onto the kingdom of Denmark. Hamlet is forced to play deranged and crazy to save his life and to cover up his violent defense against dangers around him. Ophelia will get deranged to the point of drowning herself. Then the cycle of disturbances will go on to its utter end which means the destruction of all the protagonists. Shakespeare's vision does not stop there : equilibrium is reintroduced in this disturbed kingdom by the arrival of a distant cousin, Fortinbras, who seizes power by force though he represents the last touch of legitimacy available. But this film takes two interesting options. The first one is the will to be as realistic as possible about the real living conditions of the time in the Elsinore Castle in Denmark. Gloomy, dark, shadowy, life is nothing but a shady dream accompanied by ambitious social climbers who are ready to do anything to have power and privileges. The film insists on the fate of some of these smiling hypocrites, like Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern who are shown in their last living instant just before the axe of the executioner falls on their necks in London. The film also insists on the filth of such a life and concentrates this dirt onto Ophelia. This realistic choice gives to the play a dramatic density that it deserves entirely. At times it verges onto a melodramatic dimension, especially when dealing with the mother who is an unsensitive ambitious woman who does not want to lose the status of Queen and is ready to do anything to keep that crown. In fact she cannot love Hamlet because he represents a danger to her queenhood. Zeffirelli shows her nearly as being repentant. The second option is the cutting off of the last scene, the arrival of Fortinbras to seize power by force and legitimize the return to equilibrium since he is the only surviving relative of this blood line and he had been banned out of Denmark because he was against the strange crowning of the brother of the dead King due to his marrying the dead king's wife, which is incestuous as we have seen. This change in ending cuts off any historical and political meaning in the play, and that is a shame because Shakespeare is a great historian in a way, definitely a historical playwright who has a full vision of fate and time. Why did Zeffirelli do that ? We can hardly know. Maybe he wanted to balance his Romeo and Juliet with a second drama of the same type. Maybe it is his vision of Shakespeare, even if it is a reduction.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University of Paris Dauphine & University of Paris I Pantheon-Sorbonne



5 out of 5 stars Since brevity is the soul of wit ...   May 4, 2005
Themis-Athena (from somewhere between California and Germany)
16 out of 20 found this review helpful

I will be brief; though whether witty, too, as this production is ... why, I know not.
For 'tis not a trifle thing to take a play like Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and cut its length
Almost in half, without thus giving up half of its meaning. Yet, Signor
Franco Zeffirelli: even he, who aught already did for "Romeo
And Juliet," hath made his mark again here in most splendid fashion.

The Prince of Denmark's been portrayed by Thespian royalty near and far,
First among these the great Sir Laurence. Yet here now comes Mel Gibson: a most
Unusual choice, 'tis true; and better known for other roles. But although
Action star and ladies' favourite, this venture made him humble; justly so:
"The play's the thing," he says as Hamlet, and as himself, he adds: "Hamlet belongs
On stage." And he deplores that merely one of his enactments of each scene
Should be preserved on film forever, and that he never had the chance
To delve into the role anew from night to night. - Fear not, good Sir: I think
You did great honour to the Bard's intent; well understood unhappy Hamlet's
Scorn, his rage, his doubts, his terrible paralysis, all his tormented soul.

I also do agree that although ten years older than the prince when you
Took on the part, those extra years provided further insight of the kind
That's needed for this complex role. Hadst but maintained you this same sense of
Hamlet's gravitas until the end, of my full'st praise you wouldst have been assured.
Alas, the levity that you let creep into the final duel with Laertes
In my view ill becomes that scene, and although Hamlet on its eve hath had
A premonition of his death; hath spoke of providence and sparrows,
And looking at the sunset sighed, I doubt that when he meets Ophelia's brother,
He's so far gone beyond all caring that he'd make light of their encounter.
("The rest is silence," too, would have impressed me more without the lisp.)

But let that be. For I do join you in applauding those who
With you hearkened the appeal of Signor Zeffirelli; and who
Most heartily deserve to share this feature's laurels. Princes of
British theatre: the late, great Alan Bates - usurper Claudius -
All ruthless power, cunning, even carnal, brushing away his pangs of guilt;
Yet, reck'ning he doth not escape. Paul Scofield, next, th' ill-fated ghost;
Not bearing arms, as Shakespeare wrote, but verily a perturbed spirit,
As Hamlet calls him, in his pain. And Ian Holm as counsellor
Polonius: not ponderous, nor slow of tongue and eye but quick, and yet
Slain by the prince, in Claudius's place. They all have stood on stage a hundred times,
And brought to life the Bard's great plays, so well doth it behove one new, as Master Gibson
Is, to Shakespeare's world to credit them for lessons learned; and not just for their acting.

Also permit me, pray, to speak about the ladies in this male-dictated play:
Glenn Close's Gertrude, youthful queen, who gives the lie to Hamlet's chide
And his unmerciful reminder of her flesh's humbleness, and of her
Age. A bit too Freudian, perchance, her and her son's relationship
(That's an approach I've never liked). But a commanding presence, all be told.
Yet, even more praiseworthy is Miss Hel'na Bonham-Carter; her
Ophelia well-neigh impossible to replicate, she's *that* convincing.
Now rose in bloom, in love; now in distress, now finally in lunacy; she wails,
Her hair is tangled, clothes in rags, prophetic words she speaks disguised as
Songs and flower talk, before she drowns and thus propels this drama's end.

What else? Oh aye, of course: Kudos must also go to David Watkin,
In charge of camera, and Signors Ennio Morricone and Feretti
- by first name Dante - for this film's score and the design of its production.
Faithful reporting, too, would be amiss without a word on Hamlet's foils:
Horatio, his school fellow, in Stephen Dillane's able hands, as is
Laertes in Nathaniel Parker's; and Trevor Peacock as the gravedigger,
Spot-on: a diamond in the rough. As player king, moreover, have a
Look out for Pete Postlethwaite; and unlike the movie by Olivier
This one includes both Rosencrantz and Guildenstern - Michael Maloney and
Sean Murray. Fortinbras, though, you'll search in vain in this production, too.

The words, of course, are those of Shakespeare, though moved around a bit, but not in
Ways that by and large, methinks, the Bard would take exception to. Save, that is,
"Get thee to a nunnery," which doth assume a diff'rent connotation here:
A kinder, gentler Hamlet, who still contrives to show some care about Ophelia.
(But would he really? Nay, I think not.) "To be or not to be" not in the
Courtyard but the crypt, however, that is amazingly intense: both
The performance and the imagery. As generally Zeffirelli
In troth well uses film's ability to convey meaning visually, as
In the burial of Hamlet Senior, the prince's wordless visit to
Ophelia, and in the punishment of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.

But let me close now. Brief I would be, that was my promise - well, there goes that.
Such is reviewing! Yet, what I wish, in faith, dear reader, thou hadst found
Within these lines is that I recommend this film. So go and watch it - presently!


5 out of 5 stars This is a Hamlet for today's audience.   December 10, 2004
B. Chandler (Arlington, Texas)
12 out of 14 found this review helpful

This version of Hamlet is short and fast paced. It has plenty of energy and Mel Gibson is a convincing Hamlet. The balances of the cast are top-notch actors and are in excellent form. There is enough of the story to give cohesion. There are no stories or plays that could not stand a little reinterpreting. But some times this leave out the feel. Mel actually put more feel back in to the original intent. So do not compare while watching. And watch it again.

The story takes place in Denmark. Hamlet the prince is informed by the ghost of his father that his mother and uncle were responsible for his father's death. His mother and his uncle get married before the funeral meat is cold. How will Hamlet deal with the situation and what effect will it have on others around him?


4 out of 5 stars Not what I expected!   February 8, 2004
8 out of 11 found this review helpful

Not only was I sceptical about Zeforelli as director, I was also extremely sceptical about Mel Gibson as Hamlet! But I was so wrong! Gibson takes on the role perfectly in the shortened version of the play and the supporting cast complement him wonderfully! Extremely easy to watch, even for those not used to Shakespeare's language.


4 out of 5 stars The best cinematic Hamlet   June 29, 2003
Mr. A. P. Venables
8 out of 9 found this review helpful

Mel Gibson plays the Dane in this Franco Zeffireli film. With its running time only a little over two hours this cinematic interpretation does not include the entire text.

I would argue that there has never been a truly definitive cinematic Hamlet with each interpretation having merits and weaknesses. This version of Hamlet does not alter the plays setting, in that the story takes place in a Danish castle. If anything the setting appears a little dull, with the ghost scene loosing out to the Lawrence Olivia version in terms of spectacle. In fact the film does not take much advantage of the film medium and as a result it feels very theatrical.

However Gibsons' Hamlet is one of the most favourable on film. Gibsons' Hamlet is more raw and masculine than Oliviers’ and more colourful than Keneth Branaghs'. Though his Hamlet is not a revelation he is well equipped to bring a visceral confidence to the role. In short he makes the part his own.

This also has the added advantage of having Glenn Close as a superb Gertrude and Helena Bonham Carter as Ophelia. All in all this was a decent attempt at putting Hamlet on the big screen. So if you are learning or teaching English lit. or just want to see the Shakespeare on film you could truly do worse.

However, the best cinematic Hamlet this could be but on video it faces stiffer competition in the form of the animated version.

Bluecygnet Store
International Sites: United States | United Kingdom | Canada | Germany | France
This is an Amazon associate - the products referenced on this site are manufactured and sold by parties other than Bluecygnet Store. Bluecygnet Store makes no representations regarding either the products or any information vendors offer about their products. Any questions, complaints, or claims regarding the products must be directed to the appropriate manufacturer, vendor or to Amazon.com.